Back

Journal of Clinical Virology

54 training papers 2019-06-25 – 2026-03-07

Top medRxiv preprints most likely to be published in this journal, ranked by match strength.

1
FACT- Frankfurt adjusted COVID-19 testing- a novel method enables high-throughput SARS-CoV-2 screening without loss of sensitivity
2020-05-01 infectious diseases 10.1101/2020.04.28.20074187
#1 (17.6%)
Show abstract

BackgroundIn the pandemic, testing for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR in one of the pillars on which countermeasures are based. Factors limiting the output of laboratories interfere with the effectiveness of public health measures. Conserving reagents by pooling samples in low-probability settings is proposed, but may cause dilution and loss of sensitivity. MethodsWe tested an alternate approach (FACT) by simultaneously incubating multiple respiratory swabs in a single tube. This protocol was evaluated b...

2
Evaluation of a novel respiratory virus inactivating buffer for parallel RT-qPCR and quick antigen testing
2024-03-08 infectious diseases 10.1101/2024.03.06.24303861
#1 (14.5%)
Show abstract

Since the COVID-19 pandemic, many hospitals implemented a dual testing procedure for SARS-CoV-2 to assess the infection risk of an admitted patient. To allow for a short turn-around time, rapid antigen (Ag) testing via lateral flow tests (LFT) is combined with nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT), requiring two nasopharyngeal swab collections. In this study, a novel, universal pathogen inactivation buffer (DNA/RNA Defend Pro (DRDP)) was evaluated for SARS-CoV-2 inactivation and simultaneous...

3
A longitudinal comparison of spike and nucleocapsid SARS-CoV-2 antibody responses in a tertiary hospitals laboratory workers with validation of DBS specimen analysis.
2020-11-03 infectious diseases 10.1101/2020.10.29.20219931
#1 (11.0%)
Show abstract

There is a requirement for easily accessible, high throughput serological testing as part of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic response. Whilst of limited diagnostic use in an acute individual setting, its use on a population level is key to informing a coherent public health response. As experience of commercial assays increases, so too does knowledge of their precision and limitations. Here we present our experience of these systems thus far. We perform a spot sero-prevalence study amongst staff in a te...

4
Analysis of external quality assessment samples revealed crucial performance differences between commercial RT-PCR assays for SARS-CoV-2 detection when taking extraction methods and real-time-PCR instruments into account
2020-09-23 infectious diseases 10.1101/2020.09.18.20185744
#1 (10.9%)
Show abstract

In limelight of the ongoing pandemic SARS-CoV-2 testing is critical for the diagnosis of infected patients, contact-tracing and mitigating the transmission. Diagnostic laboratories are expected to provide appropriate testing with maximum accuracy. Real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) is the diagnostic standard yet many commercial diagnostic kits have become available. However, only a handful of studies have reviewed their performance in clinical settings. The aim of this study was to com...

5
Next-Generation Sequencing Methods for Sensitive Characterisation of Hepatitis B Viral Genomes: A European Multicentre Study
2025-06-20 infectious diseases 10.1101/2025.06.17.25329745
#1 (10.7%)
Show abstract

ObjectivesThis multicentre study investigated the utility of next-generation sequencing (NGS) to detect and generate hepatitis B virus (HBV) genomes in samples of low viral load (from 0.2 to 6207 IU/ml). Methods23 HBV DNA positive plasma samples of genotypes A-E and one HBV-negative control sample were assayed blindly via 9 established NGS methods from 6 European laboratories. Methods included untargeted metagenomics, pre-enrichment by probe-capture followed by Illumina sequencing, and HBV-spec...

6
Clinical Performance Evaluation of a SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antibody Test for Determining Past Exposure to SARS-CoV-2
2020-09-04 infectious diseases 10.1101/2020.09.01.20180687
#1 (10.2%)
Show abstract

The true prevalence and population seropositivity of SARS-CoV-2 infection remains unknown, due to the number of asymptomatic infections and limited access to high-performance antibody tests. To control the COVID-19 pandemic it is crucial to understand the true seroprevalence, but not every region has access to extensive centralized PCR and serology testing. Currently available rapid antibody tests lack the accuracy needed for recommendation by health authorities. To fill this gap, we analyzed an...

7
Sensitivity assessment of SARS-CoV-2 PCR assays developed by WHO referral laboratories
2020-05-04 infectious diseases 10.1101/2020.05.03.20072207
#1 (8.9%)
Show abstract

The sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR tests developed by Charite (Germany), HKU (Hong-Kong), China CDC (China), US CDC (United-States), and Institut Pasteur, Paris (France) was assessed on SARS-CoV-2 cell culture supernatants and clinical samples. Although all RT-PCR assays performed well for SARS-CoV-2 detection, RdRp Institut Pasteur (IP2, IP4), N China CDC, and N1 US CDC were found to be the most sensitive.

8
Validation of an extraction-free RT-PCR protocol for detection of SARS-CoV2 RNA
2020-05-01 infectious diseases 10.1101/2020.04.29.20085910
#1 (8.9%)
Show abstract

In light of supply chain failures for reagents and consumables needed for purification of nucleic acid for detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA by RT-PCR, we aim to verify the performance and utility of a non-extraction protocol for RT-PCR ("direct RT-PCR"). We report improved sensitivity compared to earlier reports of direct RT-PCR testing of swab samples, in particular at the lower limit of detection (sensitivity 93% overall; 100% for specimens with high to moderate viral titre, Ct <34; 81% for specim...

9
Pushing beyond specifications: Evaluation of linearity and clinical performance of a fully automated SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay for reliable quantification in blood and other materials outside recommendations
2020-05-30 infectious diseases 10.1101/2020.05.28.20115469
#1 (8.7%)
Show abstract

1BackgroundThe ongoing SARS-CoV-2 pandemic presents a unique challenge to diagnostic laboratories. There are preliminary studies correlating qRT-PCR results from different materials to clinical outcomes, yet, comparability is limited due to the plethora of different assays used for diagnostics. In this study we evaluate clinical performance and linear range for the SARS-CoV-2 IVD (cobas6800/8800 system, a fully automated sample-to-result platform) in different clinically relevant matrix material...

10
A Multi-Laboratory Evaluation of Commercial Monkeypox Molecular Tests
2022-11-29 infectious diseases 10.1101/2022.11.27.22282791
#1 (8.5%)
Show abstract

In this report, we describe the first national scale multi-laboratory evaluation of commercial quantitative PCR kits for detection of Monkeypox virus (MPXV) DNA. The objective of this study was to assess the performance of two kits by different diagnostic laboratories across Israel. A panel of 10 standardized samples was tested simultaneously using the Novaplex (15 laboratories) and Bio-Speedy (seven laboratories) kits. An in-house assay based on previously published tests was used as reference....

11
Evaluation of the relationship between quantitative PCR results and cell culturing of SARS2-CoV with respect to symptoms onset and Viral load - a systematic review
2021-08-25 infectious diseases 10.1101/2021.08.23.21262162
#1 (8.5%)
Show abstract

BackgroundViral culture is currently the most accurate method to demonstrate viability and infectivity of Severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus (SARS-2 CoV). Routine clinical diagnosis, however, is mostly performed by PCR - based assays that do not discriminate between infectious and non-virus. Herein, we aimed to determine the correlation between positive viral cultures and either PCR positivity, the Cycle Threshold (Ct) or the number of viral copies. MethodsA systematic electronic lit...

12
Comparison of common respiratory pathogen detection in nasopharyngeal swabs, saline gargle specimens, pleural effusion and lower respiratory tract samples
2022-10-26 infectious diseases 10.1101/2022.10.24.22281433
#1 (8.4%)
Show abstract

Multiplex PCR panels have been used for the diagnosis of viral respiratory infections in the last years. While the types of manufacturer validated and thus officially approved materials are usually limited, the tested materials in the clinical routine or studies often vary, which presents a challenge in light of the new EU-IVDR guideline. Aim of our present study was to evaluate if testing of lower respiratory tract (LRT) or saline gargle specimens (SGS) provided an advantage compared to the tes...

13
Ad hoc laboratory-based surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 by real-time RT-PCR using minipools of RNA prepared from routine respiratory samples
2020-03-31 infectious diseases 10.1101/2020.03.30.20043513
#1 (8.2%)
Show abstract

We report a laboratory-based surveillance for SARS-CoV-2 using minipools of respiratory samples submitted for routine diagnostics. We tested a total of 70 minipools resembling 700 samples shortly before the upsurge of cases in Germany. We identified one SARS-CoV-2 positive patient. Our approach proved its concept, is easily adaptable and resource-saving.

14
Implementation and evaluation of a novel real-time multiplex assay for SARS-CoV-2: In-field learnings from a clinical microbiology laboratory
2020-06-05 infectious diseases 10.1101/2020.06.03.20117267
#1 (8.0%)
Show abstract

The unprecedented scale of testing required to effectively control the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has necessitated urgent implementation of rapid testing in clinical microbiology laboratories. To date, there are limited data available on the analytical performance of emerging commercially available assays for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and integration of these assays into laboratory workflows. Here, we performed a prospective validation study of a c...

15
Comparison of two commercial platforms and a laboratory developed test for detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA
2020-07-06 infectious diseases 10.1101/2020.07.03.20144758
#1 (7.7%)
Show abstract

Mitigation of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic requires reliable and accessible laboratory diagnostic services. We evaluated the performance of one LDT and two commercial tests, cobas(R) SARS-CoV-2 (Roche) and Amplidiag(R) COVID-19 (Mobidiag), for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in respiratory specimens. 183 specimens collected from suspected COVID-19 patients were studied with all three methods to compare their performance. In relation to the reference standard, which was established as the result...

16
CovidNudge: diagnostic accuracy of a novel lab-free point-of-care diagnostic for SARS-CoV-2
2020-08-15 infectious diseases 10.1101/2020.08.13.20174193
#1 (7.6%)
Show abstract

3.BackgroundAccess to rapid diagnosis is key to the control and management of SARS-CoV-2. Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) testing usually requires a centralised laboratory and significant infrastructure. We describe the development and diagnostic accuracy assessment of a novel, rapid point-of-care RT-PCR test, the DnaNudge(R) platform CovidNudge test, which requires no laboratory handling or sample pre-processing. MethodsNasopharyngeal swabs are inserted directly into a...

17
Multicenter Clinical Comparison of the 10 Minute AMDI Fast PCR Mini Respiratory Panel and the Cepheid Xpert Xpress CoV-2/Flu/RSV plus
2025-11-06 infectious diseases 10.1101/2025.11.04.25339522
#1 (7.5%)
Show abstract

RT-PCR is the gold standard to determine the etiology of respiratory viral infections caused by SARS-CoV-2, Influenza A, Influenza B, and Respiratory Syncytial Virus. Multiplex testing panels can test for infections or co-infections with these viruses at the point of care. Treatment using antiviral drugs and/or monoclonal antibodies and public health measures using vaccines and specific infection prevention practices depend upon accurate diagnoses. The AMDI Fast PCR Mini Respiratory Panel is a 1...

18
Analytical and Clinical Validation for RT-qPCR detection of SARS-CoV-2 without RNA extraction
2020-06-26 infectious diseases 10.1101/2020.06.24.20134783
#1 (7.4%)
Show abstract

BackgroundThe recent COVID-19 pandemic has posed an unprecedented challenge to laboratory diagnosis, based on the amplification of SARS-CoV-2 RNA. With global contagion figures exceeding 4 million persons, the shortage of reagents for RNA extraction represents a bottleneck for testing globally. We present the validation results for a RT-qPCR protocol without prior RNA extraction. Because of its simplicity, this protocol is suitable for widespread application in resource-limited settings. Method...

19
Evaluation of performance of two SARS-CoV-2 Rapid whole-blood finger-stick IgM-IgGCombined Antibody Tests
2020-05-27 infectious diseases 10.1101/2020.05.27.20112888
#1 (7.4%)
Show abstract

BackgroundThe SARS-CoV-2 virus is responsible for the infectious respiratory disease called COVID-19 (COronaVIrus Disease). In response to the growing COVID-19 pandemic, Rapid Diagnostic Tests (RDTs) have been developed to detect specific antibodies, IgG and IgM, to SARS-CoV-2 virus in human whole blood. We conducted a real-life study to evaluate the performance of two RDTs, COVID-PRESTO(R) and COVID-DUO(R), compared to the gold standard, RT-PCR. MethodsRT-PCR testing of SARS-Cov-2 was performe...

20
Multicenter benchmarking of short and long read wet lab protocols for clinical viral metagenomics
2024-01-17 infectious diseases 10.1101/2024.01.14.24301284
#1 (7.3%)
Show abstract

Metagenomics is gradually being implemented for diagnosing infectious diseases. However, in-depth protocol comparisons for viral detection have been limited to individual sets of experimental workflows and laboratories. In this study, we present a benchmark of metagenomics protocols used in clinical diagnostic laboratories initiated by the European Society for Clinical Virology (ESCV) Network on NGS (ENNGS). A mock viral reference panel was designed to mimic low biomass clinical specimens. The ...